Skip to main content
Doctor Who Psychology: A Madman with a BoxDoctor Who Psychology: A Madman with a Box by Travis Langley
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Over the years there has been much supplementary literature or hard science literature on science fiction books and shows, for example, there are books on the science of Star Trek, on the science of Dune, on the science of Battlestar Galactica. I think I read one on the science of Krypton or Superman but that was a long time ago. I really enjoyed these type of books. During the last wizard World Comic in Philadelphia, I ran into a new type of book.

Is a series of books that's called the psychology of..., for example, the psychology of Star Wars or the psychology of Doctor Who. In fact, I have one of these books and the whole title book is, "Unauthorized Doctor Who psychology A madman with a box" edited by Travis Langley. Before I bought the book my wife and I had an interesting conversation with him, and he then signed the book for us.

These books are a collection of papers written by many psychologists and psychiatrists on the psychological makeup or personalities of the characters in these books and shows. Let us ask the question why do we like or dislike each character in these books and shows? For example, in Star Wars, we all know The Empire is written to be evil and despotic. Yet we are drawn to certain Characters even though they are evil. In the first Trilogy, for the first two movies, who liked Darth Vader? Yet the third movie has changed our perspective of him from evil into a hero. (remember Vader tortured his own daughter). We wanted Luke to kick his arse. (well at least I did)

Afterward, more movies were done centering on (drum roll please) Anakin Skywalker who became Darth Vader. Dr. Lanley book focus on those traits and why we like them or not. In fact, he told my wife and me that one of the most violent creatures in the first trilogies were the Ewoks. But people find them cute and fuzzy. As a civilization, you really wouldn't want those creatures as your neighbors.

This aroused my interest, so I bought the Dr. Who book. After all the Doctor is a classic case of Multiple Personality Disorder. I was impressed. All 12 doctors were analyzed. The information was very well documented. It gave me a lot to think about what drives a character in a book. Or more so what motives a writer to embed a certain trait in a character, or even is the writer aware of how he is building his character. I am not a writer.

In Dr. Who, the question raises about how his brain function, if he regenrates, his brains cell should as well and should affect his personality. Why not, his appearance changes and those are genetic changes, why not his brain? when a brain change, so does a personality, this aspect is also covered in the book with real human examples. Since the Doctor doesn't actually die, his memory stays, hence his vast knowledge and wisdom. But since his brain changes, the way his brain uses the information stored is modified.



View all my reviews

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Movie Review: Dune Part 1 & 2 🎬

  Spoiler Alert! Buckle up for a desert journey like no other! In the vast expanse of cinematic adaptations, Villeneuve's Dune emerges as a monumental undertaking, spanning two epic installments that delve into the rich tapestry of Frank Herbert's iconic sci-fi saga. While paying homage to the source material, these films chart their own course, offering a visually stunning and thematically resonant exploration of power, prophecy, and the human condition. Part 1: Betrayal and Escape The journey begins with Duke Leto Atreides, a nobleman entrusted with the stewardship of Arrakis, a desert planet coveted for its reserves of the spice melange—a substance essential for space travel and coveted by factions across the universe. Accompanied by his son, Paul, and Lady Jessica, a member of the secretive Bene Gesserit sisterhood, Duke Leto embarks on a perilous mission to Arrakis. However, their arrival triggers a chain of events orchestrated by the insidious House Harkonnen and the shad

I had my Math test today...Epilepsy had other plans.

Today, I had my algebraic concept final test and I failed. Of course, my body sabotaged my efforts. This seems to be the norm with everything I do. That is when "everything I do" is extremely important and "the everything I do" maybe a life changer. Passing a math course is a life changer. So let me describe how it went today. Keep this note in mind I studied the entire weekend and the more I study things got more complicated As I wrote many times before, my neurologist and gastroenterologist have repeatedly told me that when my brain acts up my gut will too. When I take any other academic tests I usually don't get sick. I have taken all my meds and then I take life day by day. As I mentioned in previous posts on the internet maybe Facebook or G Plus, I have a few abnormalities in the brain. These abnormalities affect my behavior and my thought processes. It is not that bad but I perceive and understand things a little bit differently and that is why I may

Asimov's Foundation and Philosophy

  The essays in Asimov's Foundation and Philosophy are engaging and thought-provoking, and they offer new insights into one of the most influential science fiction series of all time. Here are some of the key philosophical themes that emerge from the essays: The ethics of manipulation: One of the central questions raised by the Foundation series is whether it is ethical to manipulate large populations of people in order to bring about a desired future result. Hari Seldon, the fictional founder of the Foundation, uses psychohistory, a science that can predict the future of large populations, to plan for the collapse of the Galactic Empire and the subsequent Dark Age. He does this in order to ensure that human civilization survives and eventually rebuilds. However, some people argue that Seldon's manipulation of the future is unethical, even if it is for a good cause. Free will vs. determinism: The Foundation series also raises the question of whether humans have free will or whe